SIGN UP

Creating an account with Tribecafilm.com gives you access to more features and services, like our weekly newsletter and other special features just for the film community.

SIGN UP

BECOME A TRIBECA INSIDER

Sign up to access information about new releases before anyone else. By joining you’re entered for a chance to
win two tickets to a red carpet premiere
at the 2015 Tribeca Film Festival.

By clicking the Sign Up button, you agree that we may send you Tribeca Film emails at the address provided above from time to time on behalf of Tribeca Enterprises (about events, promotions and activities). You can unsubscribe at any time by following the instructions in any email you receive.
X
Large_radioimage
FUTURE OF FILM ARTICLE

RACKING FOCUS: TWO DOLLAR RADIO AND THE NEXT STEP FOR MICRO-BUDGET CINEMA

A pioneering literary press from Ohio is developing a micro-budget cinema slate. Soon, more purveyors of high-quality content will be getting into the film game.

As the world of micro-budget filmmaking continues to flourish, expanding its reach beyond the dens of indie filmmakers in major metropolitan areas that have nourished it thus far, I expect we'll see something interesting happen. In fact, it's already begun to happen: the merging of micro-budget cinema with content providers coming from non-film backgrounds. This may sound a bit confusing, but I'll explain.

First off, the increasingly simple usability of the digital tools needed to make micro-budget cinema (the Canon 5D, Final Cut Pro, etc.) ensures that recent converts to film from other mediums shouldn't have a particularly tough time of getting a hold on the technical side of things. Concurrently, audiences paying for admission to see a micro-budget film aren't expecting Hollywood-level production values - they know what they're getting themselves into. What does this facilitate?

What it means is that filmmaking is increasingly becoming a content-realm that people can partake in regardless of their educational background or technical credentials; as films get even easier to make, we'll eventually approach a point where filmmaking will be a pursuit that anyone can partake in, much as anyone today can hop on their computer and start composing a novel. Technical competence will give way to a greater emphasis on content.

Many micro-budget films fail to receive the attention they deserve not for a lack of artistic merit, but simply a shortage of visibility and public relations know-how.

Shades of this can be seen in the recent news Scott Macaulay at Filmmaker Magazine reported on a few weeks ago, that Two Dollar Radio, a well-respected publishing house from Columbus, Ohio, is starting a micro-budget film division. As Scott reports, this press isn't some fly-by-night operation - their books have been acclaimed in the New York Times and honored by the National Book Foundation, among many other outlets. The implications here are extremely significant. Many micro-budget films fail to receive the attention they deserve not for a lack of artistic merit, but simply a shortage of visibility and public relations know-how. A respected literary press entering the micro-budget game means that certain pitfalls for the typical micro-budget won't apply here, since this press (presumably) has the apparatus necessary to garner publicity for its products.

The most common barrier to making a film was always technical knowledge and financing, but micro-budget cinema changes all that.

If more respected content-providers begin to make their way into the low-cost, easy-to-operate realm of micro-budget filmmaking, we may see a real watershed moment in film occur. From its inception until now, the most common barrier to making a film was always technical knowledge and financing, but micro-budget cinema changes all that. If cinema gets overrun by a bunch of providers of high-quality content making low-cost work, the nature of the game will change, creating a lessening of aesthetic standards that, for better or for worse, will allow for more "laypersons" to become practitioners of the medium.

Why wouldn't more purveyors of high-quality content get into the micro-budget cinema game?

To unpack that: I don't expect any micro-budget film to really revolutionize cinema aesthetics the way a Hollywood production, with limitless amounts of money to spend on making beautiful images, can. But if micro-budget films become more common (and higher in narrative quality), their aesthetic shortcomings may become forgiven, something audiences eventually will become accustomed to.

And why wouldn't more purveyors of high-quality content get into the micro-budget cinema game? It's cheap to make such a film, doesn't require a significant level of technical expertise, and if you run a small publishing press or magazine or radio station or some other such entity, you already have access (hopefully!) to that most desired of movie-world assets: a high-quality story. It'll be quite interesting to see how the Two Dollar Radio experiment plays out - they currently have three films on their slate.

0 COMMENTS JOIN THE CONVERSATION

RELATED STORIES

© 2015 Tribeca Enterprises LLC | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions